Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Cad. saúde colet., (Rio J.) ; 26(1)jan.-mar. 2018. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-905115

ABSTRACT

Introdução: O uso e a prescrição inadequados de antimicrobianos e a pressão da indústria farmacêutica para a sua utilização transformaram a resistência bacteriana a esses medicamentos em um problema mundial de saúde pública. Objetivo: O objetivo do estudo foi analisar o processo de implantação da Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada (RDC) da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa) de nº 20/2011, que dispõe sobre o controle dos antimicrobianos. Método: Utilizou-se o Modelo de Múltiplos Fluxos de Kingdon para examinar a inserção do tema do controle dos antimicrobianos na agenda governamental e sua posterior conformação em política pública. Foram empregadas diversas estratégias metodológicas, como a revisão bibliográfica, a análise de documentos, a busca de notícias veiculadas na mídia e informações advindas de entrevistas com informantes-chave. Conclusão: Apesar da existência de legislações e regulamentações sobre o uso e a prescrição de antimicrobianos, além da ampliação do acesso da população aos profissionais de saúde para evitar a automedicação e promover o uso correto, esforços como a educação sanitária para profissionais e a população e o reforço da fiscalização sanitária devem ser efetivamente implementados, não apenas para alcançar o uso racional, mas também para diminuir a resistência aos antimicrobianos.(AU)


Introduction: Inappropriate use and prescription of antimicrobials and the pressure from the pharmaceutical industry for their use have turned bacterial resistance into a global public health problem. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the implementation process of ANVISA's Board of Directors Resolution (RDC) 20/2011 for antimicrobials control. Method: Kingdon's Multiple Streams Model was used to examine the inclusion of antimicrobial control into the government agenda and its subsequent shaping into public policy. Several methodological strategies were employed, such as bibliographic review, document analysis, the search for stories in the media and information from interviews with key informants. Conclusion: In addition to legislation and regulations of the use and prescription of antimicrobials, easier population's access to health professionals to avoid self-medication and promote correct use, it is necessary to implement efforts such as education of professionals and the general population, not only to achieve rational use, but also to reduce antimicrobial resistance.(AU)


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/standards , Drug Utilization/legislation & jurisprudence , Primary Health Care , Brazil , National Health Programs
2.
Rev. habanera cienc. méd ; 16(4): 564-578, jul.-ago. 2017. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-901749

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Los antimicrobianos constituyen uno de los grupos farmacológicos más utilizados en la práctica clínica y está demostrada su relación con la resistencia microbiana. El uso racional de antibióticos puede producir beneficios desde el punto de vista médico y social, pero su uso en ocasiones no es el más adecuado y debe ser objeto de una vigilancia especial y sistemática. Es necesaria una política antimicrobiana coherente en las unidades de salud. Objetivo: Revisar consensos y criterios nacionales e internacionales sobre política antimicrobiana para tratar de unificar criterios aplicables lo más uniforme posible en las instituciones de salud. Material y Método: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en diferentes bases de datos: Clinical Evidence, The Cochrane Library, PUBMED, Google Académico, MEDLINE, LIS, Scielo, Medscape, LILACS, Latindex, HINARI, MEDIGRAPHIC-NEWS, NIH Reporter y en la web de la OPS/OMS sobre política antimicrobiana, comisión de antibióticos, política de antibióticos. Desarrollo: Se consideraron conceptos de diferentes publicaciones cubanas y consensos internacionales, componentes humanos, objetivos, funciones, recursos, métodos, estrategias y control. Conclusiones: Introducir cualquier modificación terapéutica en la atención médica tiene que ser correctamente valorado en todas sus dimensiones: científica, tecnológica y social. La selección del antibiótico cuando no es posible el estudio microbiológico y/o se carece de antibiograma debe ser hecha sobre las bases clínicas y epidemiológicas locales. La creación de una Política Antimicrobiana con todos sus componentes, recursos y metodología es necesaria más que nunca en estos tiempos. Puede estar sujeta a modificaciones con nuevas evidencias; pero tiene que ser cumplida para disminuir la resistencia microbiana, los costos y obtener mejores resultados(AU)


Introduction: Antimicrobials are one of the most pharmacological groups used in the clinical practice, and its relation to microbial resistance is demonstrated. The rational use of antibiotics can be beneficial from the social and medical point of view, but occasionally, their use is not the most correct one and there should be a systematic and special surveillance. A rational antimicrobial policy is necessary in the health care centers. Objective: To review national and international consensuses and criteria on antimicrobial policy to try to unify criteria and apply them the most uniform way possible in health care centers. Material and method: A bibliographic review on antimicrobial policy, antibiotics commission, and antibiotics policy was made in different databases; some of them were: Clinical Evidence, The Cochrane Library, PUBMED, Academic Google, MEDLINE, LIS, Scielo, Medscape, LILACS, Latindex, HINARI, MEDIGRAPHIC-NEWS, NIH Reporter, and the Web sites of the PAHO/ WHO. Development: Concepts on different Cuban publications, international consensuses, human components, objectives, functions, resources, methods, strategies, and controls were considered. Conclusions: The implementation of any therapeutic modification in the medical attention has to be analyzed correctly in all its dimensions: scientific, technological, and social ones. When the microbiological study is not possible or there is no antibiogram, the selection of the antibiotic should be made on the local epidemiological and clinical basis. The creation of an Antimicrobial Policy with all its components, resources, and methodology is needed now more than ever. It can be submitted to modifications with new evidences, but it has to be fulfilled to reduce both microbial resistance and the costs, and obtain better results(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/standards , Policy Making , Antimicrobial Stewardship/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/drug effects , eHealth Strategies , Health Facilities/ethics , Anti-Infective Agents/standards
3.
Indian J Med Sci ; 2001 Jul; 55(7): 393-8
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-68977

ABSTRACT

A total of 284 antiseptic solutions were studied to check for their sterility. The overall antiseptic contamination rate was 15.14%. 14.85% of freshly prepared antiseptics were contaminated. Here, the problem could be attributed to inadequate precautions while preparing the antiseptics. 15.3% of the in-use antiseptics were contaminated. This could be due to improper handling. Non-fermenters (45.45%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.30%) and Klebsiella spp. (22.72%) were the commonest organisms recovered from the antiseptics. In 44.44% of patients, the isolates obtained from the catheterised urine in the same wards matched with the isolates from antiseptics of that ward. Antiseptic solutions have to be regularly monitored. If they are found to be contaminated, they should be discarded immediately and replaced by fresh sterile antiseptics otherwise instead of preventing infection, antiseptics will become a source of hospital-acquired infection.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/standards , Data Collection , Drug Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, General , Humans , Incidence , India , Risk Assessment
4.
México D.F; México. Secretaría de Salud; 1992. 17 p. tab.
Monography in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-135254

ABSTRACT

El documento plantea como objetivos: *Dar a conocer tanto a los odontólogos de las instituciones de los servicios, como de práctica privada las bases técnicas para el manejo de métodos de desinfección, agentes desinfectantes y barrera para el control de enfermedades infecciosas en salud bucal; y *Utilizar la información del documento una vez revisada por los diferentes niveles de competencia del Sector Salud, para su integración al proceso de actualización de normas de prevención y control de enfermedades bucales. Señala los métodos de esterilización, métodos de desinfección, los procedimientos para la prevención y control de infecciones y los procedimientos para el uso de métodos de barrera para la protección del operador y asisitente en contacto con agentes infecciosos


Subject(s)
Humans , Anti-Infective Agents/standards , Education, Dental/methods , Infections , Primary Prevention/methods , Anti-Infective Agents , Anti-Infective Agents/classification , Anti-Infective Agents/isolation & purification , Education, Dental/organization & administration , Education, Dental/trends , Mexico , Primary Prevention/instrumentation , Primary Prevention/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL